Zulubet review: +4.0% at its own odds, but the range includes losing

Margus Sellin12 Oct 2026

Grade C (how we grade)data 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026last checked 11 Oct 2026

Share𝕏

Our verdict1 market tested

+4.0%

Return at its own odds, Match result (1X2), 958 picks, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026 (95% range −0.8% to +9.0%).

Read why

18+ only. Betting can cost you money.

We sell our own VIP picks, so we compete with Zulubet.

Its picks were read after the matches, so we can't prove they were published before kick-off.

OddsIntel sells a paid VIP Telegram channel of its own picks, so we compete with Zulubet. Our own numbers face the same test below. Zulubet's history was read from its public pages after the matches (proof grade C).

In our test its 958 1X2 tips returned +4.0% at its printed odds and +1.3% at the sharp close; both could be luck. Free; no owner found. Read after the games.

In our test its 958 1X2 tips returned +4.0% at its printed odds and +1.3% at the sharp close, both ranges including losing. A free site; we found no owner named. Its marks match ours on all 952 we could check. Odds read after the games.

picks tested, Match result (1X2): 958; picks tested, Match result (1X2)
accuracy or profit figures on its pages: 0; accuracy or profit figures on its pages
at the sharp close; CLV unreliable (grade C): +1.3%; at the sharp close; CLV unreliable (grade C)

Following every Zulubet 1X2 tip from 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026 at €10 a pick would have made about €384 at the average odds it prints (€10 flat on every pick, past results, illustration only). We read all 1,809 tips on its dated daily pages after the matches, graded every one we could against the scores and closing odds we record, and asked one question: does following it pay at the odds it prints?

What is Zulubet? Price, tiers and claims

In short: a free daily tips page with no owner named on the pages we read and no claim about its own results.

Zulubet is a free football predictions site. We found no company, owner or address named on the pages we read; the only contact on the site is an email address on its privacy page. Each day's page lists matches with the chances it gives home, draw and away, its tip and the average 1X2 odds, with no bookmaker named, so we graded its 1X2 tips at that average, not at any one bookmaker's price. A tip is either a single result (1, X or 2) or a double chance (1X, X2 or 12: a bet that covers two of the three results), and only the 1X2 odds are printed, so a double-chance tip has no price beside it. After the match the row shows the final score and a colour for won or lost; the site prints no win rate and no profit or loss.

It is free; we found no paid tier. It makes no accuracy or profit claim anywhere we looked. What its pages do say:

What the site says, next to what we measured

Zulubet says	What we measured
“free soccer (football) predictions, daily tips and picks”	We can only test what it publishes: 1,809 picks in our window. Alerts it left out of the record are not visible to us.
“email: info [@] zulubet.com”	not measured

“free soccer (football) predictions, daily tips and picks”
What we measured
We can only test what it publishes: 1,809 picks in our window. Alerts it left out of the record are not visible to us.
“email: info [@] zulubet.com”
What we measured
not measured

How we checked Zulubet's picks

Every pick on Zulubet's public results pages, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026: 958 graded picks in 1 market, checked against the scores and closing odds we record.

The method in full

What we collected: Every pick on Zulubet's public results pages in the window, with the odds printed beside it and its result (1,809 rows read)
Period: 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026 (30 days, by kick-off date)
Sample: 958 graded picks in 1 market; 11 picks we could not match to our fixtures (mostly leagues we do not carry). In Match result (1X2) they count, graded by Zulubet's own result, because its results agree with ours on 100% of the picks we can check (our rule: at least 97%); elsewhere they are excluded; Zulubet prints no odds for Double chance (775 picks), so it is graded only at the sharp closing price, never at a price Zulubet did not print; 2 picks whose printed score differs from the game we matched (mostly a youth or reserve side with the same club names, or a cup tie where one of the two scores includes extra time) are treated as unmatched, never graded with the wrong game
Prices: the 1X2 average odds printed in each row (no bookmaker named). A single tip (1 / X / 2) is graded at its printed price; a double-chance tip (1X / X2 / 12) has NO printed price and is graded only at market prices (the sharp close / baseline), never at a price derived from the 1X2 numbers; as the second basis, the sharp close: the closing line of the sharpest bookmaker, Pinnacle, with its margin removed
Proof grade: C: read after the fact from its history pages
Pre-committed: Site, window, markets and tests logged 11 Oct 2026, before the audit ran

Zulubet's history was read after the matches from its results pages; we did not capture it live, so the pages could have changed before we read them. Paid tiers were not tested. Break-even is computed pick by pick (the average of 1 ÷ odds). Every 95% range comes from a bootstrap that resamples whole days, because picks on the same day are linked. Voids and pushes return the stake and count as no bet; results are our fixture result over 90 minutes plus stoppage time. Sharp closing prices cover only part of Match result (1X2) (842 of 958). Its double-chance tips print no price, so they have no return at its own odds; we graded them only at the sharp close and against the rule, never at a price worked out from its 1X2 numbers. Its 1X2 odds are an average with no bookmaker named, so no single bookmaker's price can be checked against them. The price check under “Did Zulubet beat the closing odds?” was added after our first audit run and was not in the pre-commitment; it is descriptive and changes no scorecard row. Because we read the odds after the matches, we cannot tell when Zulubet recorded them, so its return may use prices that were not on offer when a tip was posted. The full method is on our methodology page.

Zulubet results at its own odds

Zulubet's tested markets, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026

Market	Picks	Win rate	Avg odds	Needed to break even	Return at its odds	95% range	At the sharp close
Match result (1X2)all picks	958	65.2%	1.71	63.5%	+4.0%	−0.8% to +9.0%	+1.3%842 of 958 picks
of which matched to our fixtures	954	65.4%	1.71	63.5%	+4.3%	−0.7% to +9.6%	as above

Market	Won	Needed	Return
Match result (1X2)all picks	65.2%	63.5%	+4.0%
of which matched to our fixtures	65.4%	63.5%	+4.3%

Source: Zulubet's own results pages, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026, graded by us. Closing odds: the sharp close (see How we checked), from the OddsIntel odds database. Rows under 300 picks, or with more than 5% of picks unmatched where they cannot count, are greyed and not used in the verdict. Match result (1X2): 6 picks (0.6%) we could not match (mostly leagues we do not carry) are graded by Zulubet's own result; its result agrees with ours on all 952 picks we graded. Closing-odds figures use matched picks only.

Zulubet also tips double chance (home or draw, draw or away, home or away) but prints no price for those, so they are not in this table; we graded them only at the sharp closing price, below. The 958 1X2 tips returned +4.0% (95% range −0.8% to +9.0%), a range that includes losing, so a month this size cannot tell a small edge from luck. Of the 828 double-chance tips we could check, 775 had a sharp closing price, and at that price they returned +1.9% (95% range −1.6% to +5.4%), also a range that includes losing. Its won or lost marks agree with our grading on all 828 we could check.

Profit day by day (chart)

€10 flat on every pick, past results, illustration only: cumulative profit and loss, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026

11 Sept10 Oct

Match result (1X2)€384

€10 flat on every pick at Zulubet's printed odds, past results, illustration only. Source: Zulubet's own results pages, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026, graded by us. Closing odds: the sharp close (see How we checked), from the OddsIntel odds database.

Did Zulubet beat the closing odds?

Zulubet's odds: capture time unknown, read after the matches (proof grade C). A tipster who beats the close is finding prices; one who doesn't is following them.

Zulubet against the de-vigged sharp close (capture time unknown: unreliable)

Market	Picks matched to a sharp close	Mean CLV	95% range	Picks beating the fair close
Match result (1X2)	842	−2.2%	−2.8% to −1.5%	27.3%

Match result (1X2)
Mean CLV
−2.2%
−2.8% to −1.5%
Picks matched to a sharp close
842
Picks beating the fair close
27.3%

Mean CLV = the expected return at the fair close. CLV per pick = its odds × the sharp close's fair probability − 1 (margin removed by the Shin method for three outcomes, the power method for two). The share beating the close is descriptive only. Source: Zulubet's own results pages, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026, graded by us. Closing odds: the sharp close (see How we checked), from the OddsIntel odds database.

Could you get its printed price?

Zulubet's printed odds against the prices bookmakers offered before kick-off

Market	Picks checked	Within the tolerance of the best price offered	More than 1.5× every book	Median against the best price	Against its reference book
Match result (1X2)	954	99.8%	0.0%	−5.5%	n/a

Match result (1X2)
Within the tolerance of the best price offered
99.8%
Picks checked
954
More than 1.5× every book
0.0%
Median against the best price
−5.5%
Against its reference book
n/a

Best price = the highest price any of the bookmakers we record offered on the same pick in the 48 hours before kick-off (median 12 books; exchanges excluded), with a 2% tolerance.

Is it skill? Zulubet against a no-analysis rule

On each day Zulubet published picks, the rule takes the same number of picks, choosing whichever outcome the sharp closing odds made most likely. No form, no team news, no model. Both sides are priced at the sharp close, so each side counts only the picks with a sharp closing price, and the two counts can differ.

Same days, picks with a sharp close: the site against a no-analysis rule

Market	Its picks	Its win rate	Its odds	Its return	Rule picks	Rule win rate	Rule odds	Rule return
Match result (1X2)	841	64.1%	1.69	+1.4%	841	77.7%	1.27	−2.5%

Match result (1X2)
Its return
+1.4%
Rule return
−2.5%
Its picks
841
Rule picks
841
Its win rate
64.1%
Rule win rate
77.7%
Its odds
1.69
Rule odds
1.27

Returns at the sharp close. Caveat: the rule chooses with kick-off prices, so it shows what a win rate is made of, not a strategy, and nobody has kick-off prices when a tip is published.

One real day of Zulubet picks

Zulubet's card, 10 Oct 2026 (selected rows)

Match	League	Pick	Odds	Sharp close	Score	Result
SC Paderborn 07 v VfB Stuttgart	Germany Bundesliga	Match result (1X2): 2	1.57	1.61	0–2	Won
FC Augsburg v Bayern München	Germany Bundesliga	Match result (1X2): 2	1.17	1.17	2–2	Lost
Union Berlin v SV Elversberg	Germany Bundesliga	Match result (1X2): 1	2.37	2.51	1–0	Won
1899 Hoffenheim v Hamburger SV	Germany Bundesliga	Match result (1X2): 1	1.42	1.43	2–3	Lost
Alaves v Atletico Madrid	Spain La Liga	Match result (1X2): 2	1.81	1.81	1–2	Won
Barcelona v Getafe	Spain La Liga	Match result (1X2): 1	1.08	1.09	3–0	Won

SC Paderborn 07 v VfB Stuttgart
Result
Won
League
Germany Bundesliga
Pick
Match result (1X2): 2
Odds
1.57
Sharp close
1.61
Score
0–2
FC Augsburg v Bayern München
Result
Lost
League
Germany Bundesliga
Pick
Match result (1X2): 2
Odds
1.17
Sharp close
1.17
Score
2–2
Union Berlin v SV Elversberg
Result
Won
League
Germany Bundesliga
Pick
Match result (1X2): 1
Odds
2.37
Sharp close
2.51
Score
1–0
1899 Hoffenheim v Hamburger SV
Result
Lost
League
Germany Bundesliga
Pick
Match result (1X2): 1
Odds
1.42
Sharp close
1.43
Score
2–3
Alaves v Atletico Madrid
Result
Won
League
Spain La Liga
Pick
Match result (1X2): 2
Odds
1.81
Sharp close
1.81
Score
1–2
Barcelona v Getafe
Result
Won
League
Spain La Liga
Pick
Match result (1X2): 1
Odds
1.08
Sharp close
1.09
Score
3–0

The full card that day held 33 graded picks, 21 of them won. Source: Zulubet results.

Zulubet scorecard: who it's for

Shows the odds for every pick

It prints average odds (no bookmaker named) beside its 1X2 tips and no price beside its double-chance tips, so not every pick has odds.

Shows profit or loss

It shows a won or lost colour and the final score for each tip, but no win rate, profit or loss.

Profitable at its own odds

Mixed

Its one busy priced market (1X2) judged at its printed odds; the odds were read after the matches (grade C). Its 958 tips returned +4.0% with a 95% range of −0.8% to +9.0%, a range that includes losing.

Beats the closing odds

Unreliable

Zulubet's odds were read after the matches (proof grade C), so the capture time is unknown and this row cannot pass. The CLV table above is printed for reference only.

Beats a no-analysis rule

Yes

1X2 at the sharp close: 841 of its tips returned +1.4% (95% range −3.5% to +6.5%), the rule −2.5% (95% range −6.6% to +1.3%); both ranges include zero, so the gap is within the noise of this sample. In double chance, not counted in this row, the rule returned +2.3% against its +1.9%.

Published record matches its picks

Yes

Match result (1X2): its result column 65.3% wins, our grading 65.3% (all 952 picks agree). Verdict uses busy markets only.

Proof grade

Grade C

read after the fact from its history pages

What it does well

It prints the final score and a won or lost mark beside every tip, and its marks match our grading on all 952 1X2 tips and all 828 double-chance tips we could check.
Its printed 1X2 odds were no more than 2.0% above the best price in the books we record before kick-off on 99.8% of the 954 picks we could check (median −5.5% against the best), so the printed average was within what the books we record offered. It is an average, so no single bookmaker is shown to have paid it.
It is free, and it prints the average odds beside every 1X2 tip, so its 1X2 record can be priced.

Who it's for: Bettors who want a free daily list of football tips with a price beside each single-result tip, and who will check what their own bookmaker offers before following one.

Who should skip it: Anyone who wants a priced record of its double-chance tips, or a win rate or profit figure on the site itself: it prints neither.

Is Zulubet legit? Our verdict

Yes, as a free tips site: it publishes each day's tips with the final score and a won or lost mark, and we found no company named on its pages. In our test its 958 1X2 tips returned +4.0% at the average odds it prints (95% range −0.8% to +9.0%), a range that includes losing. That rests on average odds of 1.71; a bookmaker paying about 4% less would erase it, and one bookmaker's price is usually below an average. Check your own price before following a tip.

Appendix

Our own picks, same test

The same window and the same columns, for two lines of ours: every settled pre-match pick of every bot on /performance at the price we published, and the subset posted to our public Telegram channel before kick-off. Our picks are in different markets at different odds, so this compares what a reader of each got, not two models on the same games.

Our numbers, the full table

OddsIntel picks, 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026

Line	Proof	Picks	Win rate	Avg odds	Break-even	Return	95% range	At the sharp close	CLV
Every pick on /performance	C	2,040	51.3%	2.19	49.4%	+4.3%	−1.1% to +9.3%	−3.7%	+1.5%
Posted to Telegram before kick-off	B	640	48.8%	2.20	48.8%	+1.0%	−8.7% to +7.8%	−4.4%	+0.3%

Every pick on /performance
Return
+4.3%
−1.1% to +9.3%
Proof
C
Picks
2,040
Win rate
51.3%
Avg odds
2.19
Break-even
49.4%
At the sharp close
−3.7%
CLV
+1.5%
Posted to Telegram before kick-off
Return
+1.0%
−8.7% to +7.8%
Proof
B
Picks
640
Win rate
48.8%
Avg odds
2.20
Break-even
48.8%
At the sharp close
−4.4%
CLV
+0.3%

Every settled pre-match pick of every bot on /performance, at the published price; the subset posted to our public Telegram channel before kick-off. Flat stake, break-even per pick, CLV against the de-vigged sharp close by the same method as above. 88.2% of the /performance picks were sealed before kick-off.

How to check any tipster in 30 seconds

The five checks

1
Ask for the odds
No odds, no verdict. A win rate on its own can't be checked.
2
Work out the break-even
1 ÷ odds for each pick, then the average. At odds of 1.25 you need to win 80% of the time. Is the win rate above it?
3
Check the sample
A few hundred picks prove little. Thousands start to.
4
Check the price you would get
Quoted odds you can't find at your own bookmaker don't count.
5
Check it against the close
Did the picks get better odds than the market settled on at kick-off? That is the sign of finding prices, not following them.

Zulubet FAQ

Is Zulubet legit?

Yes, as a free football tips site: it publishes each day's tips with the final score and a won or lost mark, and we found no company named on its pages. In our test its 958 1X2 tips returned +4.0% at the average odds it prints (95% range −0.8% to +9.0%, which includes losing).

Is Zulubet a scam?

We found no evidence that it is a scam: it charges nothing, its won or lost marks match our grading on all 952 1X2 tips we could check, and its printed 1X2 odds were no more than 2% above the best price in the books we record before kick-off on 99.8% of picks. We found no company or owner named, only an email address.

What are Zulubet's real results?

Over 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026, its 958 football 1X2 tips returned +4.0% at its printed odds (95% range −0.8% to +9.0%, which includes losing), and +1.3% at the sharp closing odds. Its double-chance tips print no price; at the sharp closing odds they returned +1.9% (95% range −1.6% to +5.4%). We read its pages after the matches.

Is Zulubet's paid tier worth it?

We found no paid tier on Zulubet; every tip we tested is free on its public pages.

How did we measure this?

We read every tip on its dated daily pages for 11 Sept to 10 Oct 2026 after the matches, matched them to the fixtures and closing odds we record, and graded 1X2 tips at its printed odds and every tip at the sharp close (the sharpest bookmaker's closing line, Pinnacle's). Every number is in the ledger file linked under Sources.

How accurate are Zulubet's predictions?

In our test its 958 1X2 tips won 65.2% against a 63.5% break-even at its printed odds, and its 828 double-chance tips won 75.7% (no printed odds, so no break-even). A win rate alone does not show profit: the 1X2 return was +4.0%, a range that includes losing.

Sources and archived copies

Show the sources

1.Zulubet: home page: read 11 Oct 2026; the site description and the day's tips · archived copy of Zulubet: home page (opens in new tab)
2.Zulubet: privacy page: read 11 Oct 2026; the only contact on the site · archived copy of Zulubet: privacy page (opens in new tab)
3.Zulubet: a dated daily page (example): read 11 Oct 2026; an example of the pages every pick was read from · archived copy of Zulubet: a dated daily page (example) (opens in new tab)
4.Ledger file: every number on this page: generated 11 Oct 2026

Every page read on 11 Oct 2026. archive.ph could not be reached from our network, so the archived copies are Wayback Machine snapshots only, taken 11 Oct 2026. Each dated daily page follows the pattern of the example above.

Updates, corrections and right of reply

Published 12 October 2026.
We did not contact Zulubet before publishing. It is welcome to respond; any reply will be published here in full.

Spot an error? Tell us in our Telegram channel and we will correct it and note the change here.

The Price Check #3 · More from The Price Check →

Keep reading

Betaminic reviewWe took every ShootingBets alert Betaminic published in September and checked it against the odds beside it and the closing odds.Betzena ReviewWe took every free pick Betzena published over 30 days and checked it against the odds printed beside it. In our test, every market with real volume lost money, and a simple rule with no analysis won more often.Benfica vs CelticMarco Silva's Benfica have lost once since 17 Aug. Martin O'Neill's Celtic arrive after a shaky September.